Forex · Head-to-head
Alpha Capital vs E8 Markets side-by-side comparison
A head-to-head look at Alpha Capital and E8 Markets — both Forex prop firms. Ratings are aggregated from public trader review scores; the stronger value in each row is highlighted.
Key differences
- A $100K evaluation costs $397 at Alpha Capital versus $488 at E8 Markets.
- Alpha Capital offers up to a 90% profit split, ahead of E8 Markets's 80%.
- Alpha Capital allows a 5% daily loss limit — more intraday room than E8 Markets's 4%.
- Overall drawdown is capped at 10% at Alpha Capital, versus 6% at E8 Markets.
- Payouts run every 14 days at Alpha Capital and on-Demand at E8 Markets.
- Across public trader reviews, E8 Markets averages 4.8/5 to Alpha Capital's 4.4/5.
Ratings & reputation
Pricing & accounts
Rules & targets
Payouts & costs
Platforms & markets
Company
Compare their exact account models
Alpha Capital and E8 Markets each sell several account models, and price, drawdown, consistency rules and payouts differ between them. These line up the products themselves rather than the companies.
Alpha Capital vs E8 Markets: common questions
Answered from the comparison data on this page.
Alpha Capital. A $100K account costs $397 there, against $488 at E8 Markets — $91 apart before any discount code.
Alpha Capital, at up to 90% against 80% at E8 Markets. Both are the ceiling across each firm's programs — the split on a specific plan can be lower, and the table above shows the plan each figure comes from.
E8 Markets funds up to $500K on one account, against $200K at Alpha Capital.
Payout cycle: Every 14 days at Alpha Capital, On-Demand at E8 Markets. Those are the firms' own published terms — our payout tracker records what each has actually paid on-chain.
Overall drawdown is capped at 10% at Alpha Capital and 6% at E8 Markets. The daily loss limit is 5% at Alpha Capital against 4% at E8 Markets.
E8 Markets, at 4.8/5 against 4.4/5 for Alpha Capital. Scores are aggregated from public trader reviews, not from us.
Related comparisons
See how each firm stacks up against the rest of the field.
